Official reaction of the Iranian cartoonists to the publication of the drawings humiliating on the Mohamed prophet

Kiarash Zandi/Iran

 

 "Not with cultural terrorism,
 not with the attack of crowned"

Derkaoui-abdellah/Morroco
the 12 drawings humiliating
 on the Mohammed prophet (The cartoons showed Mohammed in different settings.
 In one of the drawings, he appeared with a turban shaped like a bomb strapped to his head.)
 are published by a Danish newspaper
 and began again by several other European publications as
a sign of challenge to all the religious sensitivities of us,
Iranian cartoonists , a new form of terrorism which we denounce vigorously.
The initiative as of the these draughts men with court of inspiration indicates
 of one resentment with regard to Islam, religion of peace,
 tolerance and meeting of the cultures. It is about instrumental 
 work a politically and ideologically to touch the symbol
more crowned our religion with knowing our messenger,
the Mohamed prophet . It is a refusal of the acceptance of the other,
however held up by the European states like essential base of the democracy.

Seyran_Caferli/Azerbaijan
 An undemocratic step
cultural terrorism is with its apologies
with this step aiming disparaging Islam and at presenting it as religion
 which calls with violence. It is in total contradiction with the democracy
 and, in certain European countries, with the secularity which is based
on the respect of the scarness of all the religions.

Enrique Lacoste/Cuba

 The Mohamed prophet
 We consider that this step
 which pokes our sharp disappointment will not be able to reach the radiation
 of the Mohamed prophet .
Our dear prophet always remains, with or without his irresponsible insults,
 the figure on which was written the most works in the world.
The documentary one recently diffused by an American chain recalling
the principal phases of the life of  the Mohamed prophet is a strong illustration
of the radiation of the image of the prophet, symbol of peace, love and acceptance of the difference. The cartoon which has an artistic dimension inevitably
 is badly defended by the work of the Danish draughts men.
Art expresses before all the beauty, the love and the tolerance.
 Any work expressing hatred and violence, even the satire,
 does not enter the artistic field. We invite these Danish to express,
unambiguous draughts men , their excuses with all the Moslems
 of the world and to recognize that they reached the freedom of 
expression because the freedom of the ones,
stops when begin the freedom of the others.
 We also suggest to them seeking on the life of the prophet for
better knowing it before putting forth a judgment without base.

Seyran Caferli/Azerbaijan